By Kim Lowe and Matt Norris
President Obama's proposal to make community college free was another blow to for-profit higher education providers., according to a recent Forbes article that analyzed the for-profit sector's deep troubles, and a further decline in stock prices after the announcement. In Minnesota, the state Senate's DFL majority leadership also recently proposed free tuition for community college.
There is no other way to say it; reconciling return-on-shareholder investment with providing affordable, cost-effective education to middle- and low-income students challenges the for-profit business model. As educational institutions, for-profit education providers will always be subject to criticism when held up against their public and nonprofit brethren. How can a profit-making endeavor hold its head high against either a land grant state-funded college or a university founded by nuns or priests? This challenge becomes even harder given that for-profit schools tend to serve a population less able to access elite non-profit higher education providers.
Here's a possible solution. Recently Rasmussen College -- a regionally accredited private college (a for-profit enterprise owned by private investors) -- issued a press release celebrating its first anniversary as a Public Benefit Corporation. Rasmussen is one of the largest for-profit colleges operating in Minnesota. And by the way, a recent report from the state's Office of Higher Education suggests that Minnesota's for-profit colleges compare favorably on some key outcomes to their public competitors.
It remains to be seen whether the Public Benefit Corporation banner will enable Rasmussen and other Minnesota for-profits to survive and prosper, but we congratulate Rasmussen for taking this innovative course. The chartered benefit corporation model allows a for-profit school to legitimately say that student outcomes and success are at least as important as shareholder return on investment.
The Public Benefit Corporation form is a relatively new form of organizational structure that allows a for-profit enterprise to legally embrace and pursue a social purpose that is at least co-equal with shareholder return on investment. Twenty-seven states, including Minnesota, whose law took effect January 1, 2015, have adopted legislation permitting benefit corporations, which have been embraced as part of a new wave of social entrepreneurship both in Minnesota and across the country.
As proponents who helped draft this legislation, and as explainers of it, we encourage other colleges and entrpreneurs with ideas for socially beneficial enterprises to consider the advantages of public benefit corporation status and to check out other sources on the subject.
Kim Lowe, a shareholder at Fredrikson & Byron P.A., chairs the ABA Business Law Section’s Task Force on Social Ventures, leads Fredrikson’s nonprofit organizations practice group, Start Up and Rapid Growth Enterprises practice group and the newly formed Social Entrepreneur practice group. Ms. Lowe chaired the Minnesota Public Benefit Corporation Act Drafting Committee. Matt Norris, J.D., is a graduate of the University of Minnesota Law School and was a member of the Minnesota Public Benefit Corporation Act Drafting Committee. Lowe also is a member of the Growth & Justice Board of Directors.
We can only hope that voters are catching on fast to the more overlooked of two very wrongheaded constitutional amendments on the ballot this fall, and the Star Tribune Sunday illuminated the huge downside of the so-called Voter ID amendment (more accurately labeled as the Voter Restriction & Suppression Amendment). Veteran political reporter Jim Ragsdale wrote an incisive front-page piece explaining how an estimated 215,000 voters Read More
Last week South St. Paul Public Schools superintendent ?Dave Webb announced a partnership with Inver Hills Community College (IHCC) that will allow high school seniors to graduate with an associate degree at no cost and without ever leaving the high school grounds. Growth & Justice has long been advocating for more seamless transitions all along the education pathway, with high-quality early childhood education aligning with early grade... Read More
Congressman Paul Ryan is routinely described as a "wonk." And all of us policy enthusiasts have to like the new focus on substance--budgets and taxes and who gets how much--that's likely to occur with the naming of a fellow wonk as Mitt Romney's running mate. Conservative and liberal commentators also agree that the choice of Ryan signals a harder turn by Romney toward a more specific anti-tax, anti-government policy agenda. It refl... Read More
In an op/ed appearing in several Minnesota newspapers, State Representatives Deb Kiel and Dan Fabian call out Minnesota Department of Revenue Commissioner Myron Frans for saying something to the effect that a Thief River Falls entrepreneur did not build his business alone. It Read More
Sometimes the anti-tax, anti-government zealots will actually concede that the United States is an outlier in economic inequality and becoming more unequal all the time. But they hasten to insist that this is a function of a meritocracy, and that our weak economic security system and low taxes foster creativity, initiative and innovation, from which all boats will rise. But during a period marked by historic tax cuts and federal-state disinvestme... Read More
Web Development by Creative Arc, a Minneapolis Web Design firm.